This is a quick book summary and analysis of Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck. This channel discusses and reviews books, novels, and short stories through drawing...poorly.
Facebook Page - https://www.facebook.com/pages/Minute-Book-Reports/1148331925195691
This is a story about two friends, George and Lennie, who are on their way to a working farm. George is a small man with lots of big talk. In contrast, Lennie is a simple-minded large man who has a tendency to get in trouble. Both hope to one day own a farm where they can live off the land and Lennie can tend to the rabbits.
They enter the farm which is run by Curley, a spoiled, mean boss who challenges George and Lennie immediately upon arrival. Curley is married to a promiscuous woman who is known to cause trouble. On numerous occasions, George warns Lennie to stay away from her.
The working life for George and Lennie isn't too bad, as Lennie is a great field worker.
Unfortunately, he accidentally kills Curley's wife. In a panic, Lennie flees.
Curley sends his men, including George, to hunt down Lennie with a shoot-to-kill policy, as it is suspected that Lennie stole a gun.
Lennie runs to a secret spot that George had designated for times of trouble and the two meet there. Lennie is scared and asks George to tell him about their future farm. While telling the story, George pulls out the stolen gun and shoots Lennie in the back of the head. After Lennie's death, the men return to the farm for drinks.
The relationship between George and Lennie is complex, yet not so foreign. In contemporary movies and stories, we tend to see this type of relationship a lot - the best friend story. However, the difference here is that there is a tragic element to this relationship.
It is still unclear why George stole the gun at the end of the story. One would like to think that he wanted to nobly be the one to kill his friend, but an argument could be made that he wanted to be free of responsibility of Lennie and to be able to live his own life.
Taking a step back, this is really a story of misfit toys. Each character - George, Lennie, Curley, his wife, each worker - has been dealt a bad hand in life. And unlike the Christmas special where the misfit toys make it off the island, these misfits are condemned to be doomed.
Music by WingoWinston from newgrounds.com.
If you found this video helpful, please Like and Share the video with your friends. If you want to know what I’m currently reading, as well as watch other book summaries, please subscribe to the channel. Thanks.
There were more relevant points to why George shoot Lennie. For example after reading the book and watching the movie I realised there were similarities between sandy candy's dog and Lenny. Basically sandy was old and as they kept saying over and over not good for himself and better off dead just the Lenny was not good for himself and always finding himself in trouble even though the are not completely the same I sense a connection between the two sandy couldn't help itself (idk whether it's a girl or a boy anymore lol) from being old and useless just the way Lenny couldn't help himself from getting into trouble because of his condition.
As a result of sandy's disability he/she was shot. Just the way Lenny was shot at the end because George knew that he was no good to himself. So basically Sandy was a symbol of Lenny's tragic end.
George shot Lennie because there was no other way to go by it, if he had fled with Lennie, there wouldn't be Candy to lend money for the ranch w/ George. Curley instructed his men to shoot Lennie in the guts, which as you know, doesn't sound pretty.
There is NO way George would've known to shoot Lennie in the back of the head if it weren't for Carlson.
Carlson has a lot of experience with guns, considering he knows how to painlessly kill a dog.
George shot Lennie in the back of his head so he would die painlessly. (I'm leaving out some reasons, e.g.: he doesn't want someone to kill him out of hate, or "nobody hurts him but me")
Correct me if I’m wrong
Chapter 1 introduces lennie and George people who move from ranch to ranch harvesting crops and they also have a similiar dream of owning a farm.
In chapter 2 they meet Candy an old worker and they also meet up with their boss and his son curly they had a talk about why they didn’t appear last night.later on the day lennie met with curlys wife who was a flirtatious girl but George noticed the 2 talking and called lennie telling him not to go near her.
Hey, a bit of friendly advice: you may want to study the book a little more carefully. Curley, for example does not own the ranch, but is the boss' son, and so feels as though he does. This is called misuse of natural authority. Also, George shoots Lennie not because he wants to " nobly " kill his friend, and even though he is tired of responsibility over Lennie, it is incredibly unlikely for him to want to shoot him to be free of that pressure. I feel that George shoots Lennie to save him the pain and torture Curley wants to put him through. (Note that George shoots Lennie in the same manner that Carlson shoots Candy's dog, " right in the back of the head " and Carlson reassures Candy that the dog " won't even feel it "). George wants to put Lennie through as little pain as possible. Please take my reasoning into account, and thank you for the summary.
Curley isn't the boss of the ranch and the reason that George shot Lennie... Well if you think back to when Candy said to George "I shoulda shot that dog myself, George.". Really George just wanted Lennie to die peacefully and he knew he had to do it because he would regret it if he didn't.
Men and women have at their disposal an array of resources for generating greater knowledge of truth so that their lives may be ever more human. Among these is philosophy, which is directly concerned with asking the question of lifes meaning and sketching an answer to it. Philosophy emerges, then, as one of noblest of human tasks. According to its Greek etymology, the term philosophy means "love of wisdom". Born and nurtured when the human being first asked questions about the reason for things and their purpose, philosophy shows in different modes and forms that the desire for truth is part of human nature itself. It is an innate property of human reason to ask why things are as they are, even though the answers which gradually emerge are set within a horizon which reveals how the different human cultures are complementary.
Philosophys powerful influence on the formation and development of the cultures of the West should not obscure the influence it has also had upon the ways of understanding existence found in the East. Every people has its own native and seminal wisdom which, as a true cultural treasure, tends to find voice and develop in forms which are genuinely philosophical. One example of this is the basic form of philosophical knowledge which is evident to this day in the postulates which inspire national and international legal systems in regulating the life of society.
Nonetheless, it is true that a single term conceals a variety of meanings. Hence the need for a preliminary clarification. Driven by the desire to discover the ultimate truth of existence, human beings seek to acquire those universal elements of knowledge which enable them to understand themselves better and to advance in their own self-realization. These fundamental elements of knowledge spring from the wonder awakened in them by the contemplation of creation: human beings are astonished to discover themselves as part of the world, in a relationship with others like them, all sharing a common destiny. Here begins, then, the journey which will lead them to discover ever new frontiers of knowledge. Without wonder, men and women would lapse into deadening routine and little by little would become incapable of a life which is genuinely personal.